The question concerns changeability, tests and specific code issues.
Codebase auditSoftware audit.
Understand the quality, risks and maintainability of your software.
Discuss your projectWhich technical assessment do you need?
You need a review of the system, architecture and operations.
Software audit (this service)An investment or acquisition requires evidence of technical risks.
Technical due diligenceWhat does a software audit investigate?
A software audit assesses agreed aspects of an application and its development process, such as maintainability, architecture, tests and dependencies. BLACKOPS Software connects findings to evidence and business impact, showing which improvements need attention and which topics remain outside scope.
When it is a good fit
Useful when changes become difficult, incidents recur or an investment needs evidence. A focused question usually produces more actionable findings than a general request to check everything.
When to take a different approach
An audit does not guarantee all defects or security issues are found. Penetration testing, certification and legal investigation need their own scope and expertise.
Compare your options
Choose based on the task, the people involved and what you can maintain.
| Approach | Useful when | What to consider |
|---|---|---|
| Codebase audit | Focus on structure, dependencies and testability. | Not automatically a complete view of operations and organisation. |
| Software audit | Review multiple technical and process aspects. | Agree breadth and depth in advance. |
| Technical due diligence | Support an investment or acquisition. | Questions follow the transaction and relevant assumptions. |
What we need to start
- Access to agreed repositories and documentation.
- Concerns, incidents or decisions the review should support.
- Someone available to explain design and operations.
How to assess the result
- Findings include evidence, impact and clear priority.
- Assumptions and unexamined areas are explicit.
- The improvement plan separates quick measures from structural work.
What determines the cost?
A useful estimate starts with the scope. We distinguish development work from recurring usage and operating costs. These are the main drivers:
- Systems, repositories and quality aspects examined.
- Depth and availability of documentation.
- Whether follow-up, remediation and reassessment are included.
Your challenge.
A practical application.
You want to understand technical risks before investing further.
Understand the quality, risks and maintainability of your software. We agree what the solution should do, which information it needs and how the result will be assessed.
Which concerns or incidents should we investigate specifically?
An approach with
clear steps.
You stay informed about decisions, progress and delivery. We adapt the scope to your organisation.
Agree the question and scope
Which concerns or incidents should we investigate specifically?
Examine evidence and dependencies
We use representative examples and discuss the results, making assumptions and limitations visible before proceeding.
Discuss findings and priorities
We document the agreed outcomes, responsibilities and next steps.
Designed for your
systems and requirements.
Technology that fits
Code, architecture documentation, test results, infrastructure information and discussions with your technical team.
Security and control
We agree the investigation boundaries and access in advance. Findings distinguish demonstrated risks from issues requiring further investigation.
You want to understand technical risks before investing further. The project can start with one focused component. Together we assess whether expanding it makes sense.
Illustrative scenario; not a published client case.Your questions.
Clear answers.
Do I receive a report or improvements too?
The audit delivers agreed findings and recommendations. Implementation can be a follow-up assignment. Explicitly agreeing assessment and remediation keeps deliverables clear.
Can an audit avoid changing production?
Much investigation uses read access, code and documentation. Additional tests require agreed environments and boundaries. An audit does not itself authorise disruptive tests.
Where do we start with software audit?
Which concerns or incidents should we investigate specifically? We discuss this together, define the scope and establish what is needed for an informed proposal.
What does the project cost?
The investment depends on scope, existing systems, data quality and required integrations. Your proposal separates the work, assumptions and any recurring usage or operating costs. A useful estimate requires an understanding of your situation.
How long does delivery take?
We agree a schedule once the scope and dependencies are known. System access, team availability and acceptance testing are included in the plan. Where possible, we start with a focused first step.
Can we keep our existing systems?
Code, architecture documentation, test results, infrastructure information and discussions with your technical team. We investigate the possibilities and limitations before proposing a technical approach.
What happens after delivery?
You receive a handover explaining the solution and its documentation. Maintenance, support and further development are agreed separately, including responsibilities and how errors will be handled.